|
Based on my experiences as an acinic
cell carcinoma patient over the past 20 years or so, I have been put
into the position of having to learn about many things that I never
expected to. Some of what I have learned has come from mistakes that
were made by me or by others. Some has come from diligent research on
my part, and by making more informed decisions. And some of it has come
just from having to go through the various processes and logistics of
medical care for many years. I have created this website (and the acinic
cell email group at ACOR) so that the many things I have learned are
not wasted by just being useful to me. I figured out at a certain point
that all the little details I have accumulated could be useful to other
acinic cell carcinoma patients. Many of these “helpful hints”
are also applicable to patients with other types of cancer, as well
as those with other “rare diseases”, who need to take a
more active role in their own health care.
So in this section of our website I have tried to cover a few of these
details and “pearls of wisdom” I have collected. Some of
the list gives practical suggestions and specific things “to-do”,
while some of it falls more under the heading of “philosophy and
approach”. Please keep in mind that these are all my opinions,
and not licensed or professional medical advice. I hope they are helpful
nonetheless. And do feel free to pass these suggestions along to your
physician(s), a nd ask them if they make sense for you and your case
specifically.
No one ultimately will care more about your
own medical care than you (or your loved ones). Even if you have the
most caring and sensitive physicians, they can never be as intimately
involved with your case as you can. Simple logistics dictate that doctors
who have multiple patients can never spend as much time working on your
case, as you (or your loved ones) can (theoretically). You have only
one case to think about. They have many. These realities are not as
important when you are dealing with a common illness, or with a standard
treatment protocol. But in this case YOU HAVE SOMETHING VERY RARE AND
UNUSUAL. It is also a disease without a standard curative treatment.
Both of those characteristics dictate that more time will likely need
to be spent considering treatment options, follow-ups, etc.
IIn my opinion, there are two kinds of physicians: The Generalist
, who has the time to learn a limited amount about MANY different subjects.
And The Specialist, who has the time to learn a great
deal about a very specific area. In the case of a very rare disease
(like acinic cell carcinoma), NEITHER of these kinds of physicians usually
fits the bill. This is not meant as a disparaging remark, rather a practical
observation. Doctors have limited time. They have many patients, and
they have to constantly be learning about new things. It just usually
makes more sense for them to learn about diseases that they are more
likely to treat, rather than the really rare ones. That is also why
most doctors have never even heard of acinic cell carcinoma, let alone
ever treated a case. (Of course there are exceptions, and certain specialties
should at least have heard of it.) Some specialists (such as ENTsurgeons)
do not necessarily need to know all about the disease to perform many
aspects of their role in treatment. But by and large, most physicians
are not specialists in acinic cell carcinoma. And that means that they
are not always able to give you informed treatment advice. So what all
this adds up to is that as the patient, YOU have to take on
more responsibility.
Obviously, you are already doing this to some degree, because you have
come to this website. One possible next step is to take what you learn
here, and pass it along to your doctor(s), so they can use it to make
more informed decisions about your case. This will save them time, and
likely will help them to treat your case with more positive results.
This does NOT mean that you should ignore the advice of your doctors,
or assume that they don’t know what they’re talking about.
Obviously they have gone through a lot of professional training to get
where they are. And they may have a great deal of treatment experience
to bring to the table as well. Sometimes general medical experience
is just as useful as knowing the specifics of a certain disease. But
what you as the patient also need to be aware of, is that just because
they are “doctors” and wear white coats, you can’t
automatically assume that they know everything they need to about this
extremely rare disease. And just because they are wearing those white
coats, doesn’t mean that you have to abdicate responsibility for
your treatment, and turn it all over to them. They are human beings.
Some will know more, some will know less. Some will have more experience,
some will have less. Some will be open to your input. Others won’t.
You should be able to have an open dialogue with your physician. You
should be able to ascertain from them how much experience they have
had with this cancer and treating it. You should be able to feel comfortable
telling them about things you have learned on this website (or elsewhere).
And the doctor(s) should be willing (eager even) to LEARN MORE ABOUT
THE DISEASE AND TREATMENT, especially if they don’t know it already.
This may even mean learning a few things from their patient who has
done a lot of research. It is my experience that the good doctors who
put their patients before their egos WILL be willing to do all these
things and more. There are plenty of doctors out there who when they
don’t know about something WILL try and learn more about it. So
even if they haven’t had the clinical experience themselves, they
are willing to learn about it. And they may be very happy to learn about
sources like this website. Hopefully these are the doctors treating
you. It is very important to note that you don’t necessarily
have to have an ACC expert handling your case, as long as you have a
good caring doctor, willing to learn more about it.
On the other hand, you may find physicians who are not interested in
what you have to tell them, or who think they have all the answers,
even if they are not that familiar with acinic cell carcinoma. In those
cases, perhaps it is time to consider taking your business elsewhere.
Obviously there will also be some physicians out there who have had
more experience dealing with this disease. (We have tried to list some
of them in our “Treament Centers and Doctors” section).
And these doctors may even be able to inform and treat you based on
their previous hands-on experiences with ACC patients. That can be very
useful.
On the other hand, you might find a doctor with lots of ACC treatment
experience who is not as caring a person as the one with less expertise,
or with whom you don’t feel comfortable for some reason. So sometimes
the physician with less expertise but more interest in your case may
be the better choice for you. These are the kinds of decisions you have
to make as an involved patient.
The important thing to remember, no matter how informed or experienced
or caring your physicians are, is that this is YOUR CASE, YOUR BODY
and YOUR LIFE. So you need to be (at least) an equal
partner in making decisions about your case. Don’t abdicate that.
Since this is a disease without a definitive course of treatment, or
a standard successful protocol leading to cure; you will usually need
to consider different opinions, from research in places like this, as
well as from different physicians. That is where it becomes YOUR responsibility
to make choices. Some of you may feel uncomfortable with that role.
You may feel much more comfortable letting “Marcus Welby”
make these kinds of decisions for you. (After all, most of you didn’t
go to medical school, so that is understandable.) Unfortunately Marcus
was just a TV character. And most likely Marcus hadn’t ever heard
of acinic cell carcinoma. So you need to help him out.
The key is getting informed…both for you and your doctor. You
need to learn what you can…pass it along…and tell your health
professionals where they can learn more themselves. All I am really
saying is that you can’t just sit back and blindly trust others
to make life and death decisions for you, without your taking on some
of the responsibility as well.
If you agree that taking on some responsibility for your health care
is a good idea, here are some specific suggestions about how to go about
doing that…
Obviously if you have gotten to this website, you have already made
the decision to learn more about this cancer. That’s great. I
feel that it is important for anyone with any illness or medical condition
to educate themselves about it as much as they can. By being educated,
you will be more informed when you go into doctors’ meetings.
You will be able to ask informed questions, rather than nieve ones.
Meetings with physicians can be more productive, and be “discussions”
rather than “educational lectures”. You can discuss treatment
options, pros and cons, etc, rather than learning basic facts you could
have learned elsewhere. Doctors meetings often have time constraints.
So now you will be able to spend more time on productive discussion.
Also, you may be able to introduce subjects that the physician would
not have intitiated themselves. You can ask questions about details
you read about, and how they relate to YOUR case.
In the case of an extremely rare disease like this, educating yourself
is even more important. If you do a lot of reading and gathering of
current information, you MAY find out things that the doctor hasn’t
heard of yet. And you can direct them to that information. As mentioned
earlier, it is likely that YOU will have more time to spend researching
your case than a doctor will. After all, THEY have many patients. You
only have one – YOU. So by educating yourself, you may be able
to help your doctor treat you more knowledgeably.
Even if your physician is very knowledgeable about the disease, the
fact that you have become informed yourself will only enhance the quality
of discussions you are able to have with them.
No one is expecting you to suddenly become a medical professional, just
because you went to a website and read a few articles. And in fact,
sometimes a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing, especially if
you do not see it in context, or with the appropriate experience. I
am certainly not expecting all of you to be able to read medical journals
and understand everything . Sometimes you will understand certain things,
but not others, which may lead you to mistaken conclusions. Obviously
trained health professionals will be able to understand many of the
articles enclosed on this site more than most patients. On the other
hand, the “abstracts”, or article summaries, are usually
pretty easy to understand, especially after you’ve read a few
of them. In addition, I have usually included “Overviews”
of subjects on many of the introductory pages of this site. If you read
the Overview, you may not need to read the individual citations. OR,
at least the Overview may give you a perspective which puts the citations
in context within a bigger picture. I have also always provided a short
synopsis of each citation listed anywhere on the site. Often that is
all you will have to read to get a summary of the citation subject.
One important thing to remember is that just because one article draws
a certain conclusion, that does NOT mean that all articles (or researchers)
agree with that conclusion. Despite the potential pitfalls of lay people
reading literature they may not understand… I think the general
idea of “getting informed and educated” outweighs the potential
dangers. Everyone should do whatever they can, and whatever feels right
for THEM/YOU.
The key is to learn enough so you can do the following things:
1) Learn enough so that YOU feel you understand what disease you have,
what your prognosis is, and what your treatment options are.
2) Learn enough to be able to help your doctor help you.
3) Learn enough so you can have an informed and understandable discussion
with your doctor(s) about treatment options, follow-ups, etc.
4) Learn enough to be able to ask intelligent questions.
5) Learn enough to be able to make INFORMED DECISIONS about your case.
One Practical Note:
This is a very comprehensive website. And,as with in any internet work,
it is easy to go down some road, get sidetracked, and never return.
I recommend taking a moment to think “What is most important for
me to learn right now?” Then scan the list of “buttons”
to sub-pages on the Main page of this site. Look for the pages that
might hold the quickest answers to that question. Go to those pages
first.
Whenever you go to a doctor’s meeting, you need to PREPARE for
it. No one probably ever told you that before. But you have to think
of this as a very important meeting…in fact a meeting that may
determine the outcome of YOUR LIFE. To prepare for that meeting/consult,
you need to do the following :
BEFORE THE MEETING:
1) Write down a list of questions.
2) Think of questions that might follow some of the doctor’s answers
to your questions.
3) Organize your list of questions so that the most important ones are
asked first. That way if you run out of time those aren’t the
ones left unanswered. (I try to write my questions on the computer so
I can re-order things as needed.)
4) Do as much research on the subject of the meeting as possible beforehand.
That way you can ask INFORMED questions. You will now be able to discuss
things such as other treatment options , or potential side effects,
that perhaps the doctor would not have brought up on their own.
5) Always bring a writing pad, and writing implements.
6) If it is okay with your doctor (and you feel comfortable with it),
some people bring a little tape recorder instead of trying to write
everything down in the meeting. (Make sure the doctor knows it is just
so you “get all the information”, not for any other reason.)
7) If the meeting is about really big important decisions, and you know
you will have a lot of questions… Try and get the meeting scheduled
for a longer time slot. Talk to the doctor’s nurse or secretary
and try to find out which time slot will result in you getting the most
time. Sometimes that is the last appointment of the day. Sometimes you
can request a longer time slot as well.
IN THE MEETING:
1) Let your doctor know right away that you have brought a number of
questions to ask, so that he/she allots time for that.
2) Ask the most important questions first.
3) If you are writing answers down (as opposed to recording them), write
short answers with KEY WORDS. Leave space for the rest of the answer
on the paper. (Then after you leave, you can fill in the rest of it.)
Obviously if you know shorthand, this is even better.
4) Sometimes it helps to bring someone else WITH you to important doctor
meetings. Then there are two sets of ears to hear things, and two sets
of hands to take notes as well. (Or it frees you up to listen better
while your companion takes the notes.) The other advantage of this is
that there is someone to discuss the meeting with afterwards. This can
be very helpful if you are having to make a difficult decision about
something.
5) Make sure you understand the things the doctor tells you. Ask the
doctor to re-explain things if you don’t.
6) Think of questions based on the doctors’ answers.
7) Ask the Doctor if he is willing to answer more questions later by
email (many are doing that these days). That also will take the pressure
off of having to answer ALL your questions in a short meeting. Don’t
forget to get the doctor’s email address, if they say it’s
okay.
8) Ask the doctor for copies of any paperwork or test results that have
been run recently. (It is usually easier for a nurse to make a photocopy
of things while your chart is out after the meeting, rather than to
request it later.)
9) Don’t forget to ask for any prescriptions you may need.
10) Discuss any tests that should be done for follow-ups or diagnostics.
11) Schedule your next meeting, or procedure or tests.
AFTER THE MEETING:
1) Immediately sit down somewhere and fill in all the missing notes
from the meeting.
2) If you brought someone with you, use them to help you make sure all
your notes are correct and complete.
3) If you brought someone, discuss the meeting with them, and their
opinions of your doctor and the subjects discussed.
4) Take the time to carefully consider what has transpired in the meeting.
Read over your notes. Sometimes one gets emotionally involved with a
reaction (either positive or negative news), and then forgets to both
deal with the details, or to take the time to really understand the
situation. Sometimes this also leads to hasty decisions, that perhaps
should be considered more carefully.
EMAILING DOCTORS:
These days, many doctors are finding this a valuable way of communicating
with patients, because they can deal with their emails at their convenience,
on their schedule. This can also be an extremely efficient way of getting
patients’ questions answered, without having to have an office
visit or to avoid the challenge of phone calls not always connecting
people. I do however have a few suggestions for keeping the email system
working:
1) DON’T INUNDATE YOUR DOCTORS. Try and limit both the frequency
and to some degree the length, of emails. If there is one thing that
most doctors have in common these days, it is that they are very busy.
So if you bug them too much, they may react accordingly. That doesn’t
mean to settle for not getting your questions answered. It just means
that you should be aware and careful. I use email as a “once in
awhile” option. That way you don’t abuse the privilege,
and they won’t get annoyed.
2) Pick your questions carefully. Don’t ask them questions that
you can get answered for yourself (like on this site). Instead, save
the questions for them that you really want THEIR opinion or answer
on.
3) Try and save questions until you have a few to ask. I find it is
better to send one email with 5 questions, rather than 3 emails in one
day, or 5 emails in 5 days. On the other hand, don’t send emails
with 50 questions. Use your discretion. The way your doctor replies
to your emails is usually a good indication.
PHONING DOCTORS:
At certain times a phone call to your doctor is more appropriate than
an email. If you really need to have a “discussion” about
a subject, which could have a lot of back and forth Q&A, then that
may indicate a phone call is required. On this subject, these are my
observations:
1) Most of the time when you call a doctor, you will have to leave a
message (unless you tell the receptionist or secretary that it is truly
urgent). By the way, DON’T SAY IT’S URGENT OR AN EMERGENCY
UNLESS IT TRULY IS.
2) Ask the person who takes the message WHEN it is likely that the doctor
will return your call. This is so that you know which phone number(s)
to give them.
3) Leave the phone number that YOU KNOW YOU WILL BE AT at about the
time the doctor may call. Tell the person who takes the message that
you will be at “such and such number” from “this time
to this time”. If you have multiple phones, which you will be
at at different times, leave all that information. What you are trying
to avoid is the doctor calling and not getting you. Phone tag is not
a fun game with doctors. Better to make sure you are there when they
call.
4) Once again, write a LIST OF QUESTIONS before the phone call. Put
the most important questions first. And arrange the questions in a logical
order that would follow the intended discussion.
5) Make sure you have something to write with prepared, so you can write
down the doctor’s answers.
6) Once again, be aware that the doctor
has limited time. Try to prepare questions that are not redundant, and
that are truly questions THEY have to answer. Don’t waste their
time with questions nurses or secretaries can answer. You can call those
people separately.
7) Things like prescriptions, scheduling, and most logistical questions
can be handled by nurses, secretaries, receptionists, etc.
Many people do not realize that you have a right to have any and all
of this in formation. In the case of a rare disease like ours, it’s
even more important. Often, you will want to seek second opinions, or
get treatment at another medical center . This is all simplified if
you already have all your medical records (and also if you keep them
organized.)
I recommend getting copies of all doctor meetings, all test results,
all radiology reports, all films. Usually you can arrange this directly
through your doctor, or your doctor’s secretary or nurse. In larger
hospitals or cancer centers, sometimes you have to request such items
from the Medical Records department . This usually takes longer, and
sometimes fees are charged. I recommend asking the people that are treating
you or know your case, first. These people will often be able to accommodate
requests like this easier , quicker (and cheaper) than the Records departments.
Films for tests run in the past can usually be requested from the film
libraries of your medical center. These will usually end up being copies
of the original films. It is better to request a duplicate copy of films
AT THE TIME YOU GO IN FOR A TEST. You can tell the radiology technician
BEFORE the test that you have an unusual case, and that it is (or may
be) followed in different locations. So “can you please run me
a second set of films?” They will usually be able to accommodate
you. And in this case you will usually get a duplicate original, which
is better quality than a copy. Also, you may not be charged a fee if
you get the films directly from the radiology department and not the
library. To save fees, you can also arrange for the films to be sent
to a specific doctor (not at the institution tests were run). Usually
you are not charged for films (or medical records) shipped directly
to another physician. However, then they will not be in your possession
either. Sometimes you can get your films and records shipped to that
doctor you will meet later. Then, after that meeting, you can request
copies (or the originals they received) directly from them, at no charge.
After you get your medical records and films, keep them organized. I
label all my films by date, and keep them stored in large envelopes,
each for a different year. I keep official medical records in separate
envelopes organized by year, and as copies in a binder in chronological
order. I also keep all the notes from meetings with doctors, test results,
emails, phone conversations etc. in binders, in chronological order.
This way I can always refer to a previous note or record if needed.
Don’t ever give away your original copies. If you need to give
a new physician copies of records, make copies, or have their nurse
or secretary make copies of your originals when you get to the office.
With any cancer it is better to catch and treat it earlier rather than
later. Sometimes the fact that Acinic Cell Carcinoma grows slowly, and
can have an indolent course of progress can be misleading. In fact there
were times when ACC was considered “benign”, which it is
NOT. (Some physicians using older textbooks and information may STILL
consider it benign.) The fact is that although most cases of ACC are
slow-growing and “low-grade”, the disease also has incredible
resilience, and a strong propensity for recurrences and metastases.
The likelihood of both of those outcomes increases when the
primary tumor is not treated fast enough or effectively enough.
Specifically, when tumors are left untreated until they are 2 cm or
larger (classifying them as Stage II), risks increase. Risks of local
recurrence or metastases (distant recurrences) also increase with insufficient
tumor removal, or presence of tumor in lymph nodes or blood vessels.
The goal of any surgery should be complete removal of all tumor.
At this point in time, if complete surgical removal is not successful,
or if there is residual disease (suspected or actual), the best course
of action is post-operative radiation therapy. You have a number
of options of different methods of radiation to consider. At
this point, I feel that the best (currently available) option for local
tumor control is High Energy Fast Neutron Beam Radiation. As
of 2002, this treatment was available at nine (9) facilities throughout
the world. There is another form of “high LET” Radiation
Therapy called Heavy Ion Radiation. It is also a heavy
particle beam, like Fast Neutrons. But it is more focusable /controllable,
so it can potentially avoid some of the side effects risks to nearby
tissues posed by Neutrons. As of 2004, this treatment was only available
in two locations in the world; GSI in Darmstadt/Heidelberg, GERMANY
and HIMAC in Chiba, JAPAN. Last we knew (2004) the German facility was
not taking ACC patients. (But that could have changed.) The Japanese
facility we are not sure about. (If anyone gets an ACC case treated
at either facility, please let us know!) There is also the option to
consider of using conventional radiation (photon and electron beams).
Our opinion is that in general, conventional radiation is not effective
in the long term against Acinic Cell Carcinoma. Some data indicates
that Accelerated Hyper-Fractionated dosing schedules of
conventional beams MAY be more effective on these kinds of cancers than
standard dosing methods. There is not enough data on this that
we know of to make a strong statement. On the other hand, most data
indicates that High LET radiation, such as Fast Neutrons or Heavy Ions
will be more effective in the long term for slow growing salivary gland
cancers like low grade ACC. If there is only suspected or minimal microscopic
residual disease, the conventional options are often chosen, and this
may be adequate for those cases. Patients and physicians who want to
be more proactive and increase their chances of control, will often
choose the high LET methods. But they do come with some higher risks
of side effects, so that also needs to be considered. What is unfortunate
is that even for higher risk cases, the choice will often be made to
treat a patient with conventional radiation simply because it is much
more widely available and convenient. Other physicians will not offer
patients the Fast Neutron/Heavy Ion options because they do not know
about them, or they are not well informed about this cancer. We
feel very strongly that not fully informing patients on this subject
is irresponsible. But yet it happens constantly. For cases
of incomplete tumor removal, macroscopic residual disease, larger primary
tumors, invasion of lymph nodes or blood vessels, higher grade ACC (and
other risk factors) use of Fast Neutron or Heavy Ion Radiation is definitely
recommended. It is likely that these methods are more effective at local
control in all cases of this cancer. However, there are other factors,
such as potential side effects, availability of treatment centers and
qualified facilities, patient location and financial concerns, etc.
that make treatment of all ACC patients with Fast Neutrons impractical,
or not justifiable. Each case needs to be considered individually, but
the patient needs to be given enough GOOD information to make an informed
decision. It is worth noting that there are a number of other radiation
therapy options not mentioned in this brief summary. That includes Proton
Beam and variousconventional delivery methods such as IMRT, Stererotactic,
Tomotherapy, etc. While these treatments can be useful for many cancer
patients and many cases, they are still low energy radiation, and in
our opinion not as effective for long term control as Fast Neutrons
or Heavy Ions. They may have application for some ACC cases in specific
situations, but not as a general rule. You can read more about the various
forms of radiation on the Treatment pages of this site.
In some cases, surgery is challenging, and complete tumor removal is
unlikely. This may be due to either size or location of tumor. Sometimes,
pre-surgical evaluation indicates that complete tumor removal would
result in damage to critical structures such as the facial nerve or
hearing. In those cases, Fast Neutron Radiation may be considered as
a SOLE TREATMENT INSTEAD OF SURGERY. This may result in better patient
outcome, with less damage to critical structures, and more local control.
What is important to remember is that it is best to treat the primary
(first) site of this cancer as effectively as possible, however it is
done. You want to do the best job you can of controlling the disease
LOCALLY, to hopefully insure against both local and distant recurrences
later. At this point in time, the best weapon we have to try and insure
this, is radiation treatment, and specifically Fast Neutrons. (And possibly
Heavy Ions, if they are available.)
IF the primary tumor site was NOT treated post-operatively with radiation,
and there is a recurrence, the same philosophy holds. TREAT THE SITE
OF RECURRENCE AS EFFECTIVELY AS POSSIBLE TO INSURE AGAINST ANY MORE
RECURRENCES OR METASTASES. Sometimes this means treating the recurrence
only surgically, if the tumor can be totally removed without residual
disease, and without patient deficits. Radiation treatment does pose
risk of side effects which in some cases may not be warranted. There
is still debate in the field as to whether complete tumor removal surgically
is as effective as surgery with post-operative radiation, with regard
to long-term control.
In some cases, if a patient was treated with conventional (photon/electron)
radiation, and then had a recurrence in that area anyway (which happens
quite often)… Fast Neutron radiation to the same site may be considered.
There is some danger in over-radiating the area, as normally radiation
treatment is given to the maximum tolerance of healthy tissue. Each
case needs to be evaluated individually as to the potential risks and
benefits. The choice may then be between tumor control versus permanent
side effects.
(Short “Summary” Version)
-
Physical
exams of head and neck area by oncologist or ENT/Otolaryngologist.
Do at every follow-up (assuming primary site was in parotid gland,
or other head and neck site.) To rule out other sites or recurrences
near original site.
-
Physical exams (if possible)
of any areas where there were previous cancer sites. Do at
every follow-up. To check for possible recurrences.
-
Blood Tests:
Routine blood and metabolic panels should be done at most follow-ups,
and definitely during treatment periods. Blood tests can show up abnormalities
that may be related to tumor growth, medications, side effects, etc.
-
MRIs and/or CT Scans of
Previous/Current Tumor Sites: The most detailed imaging studies
possible should be performed pre-treatment and post treatment of any
tumor site. After that, they should be performed periodically to determine
if a particular tumor has grown, decreased in size, recurred, etc.
Frequency of tests varies depending on the case specifics. If a tumor
site has been treated seemingly successfully, you will probably run
an MRI or CT Scan every 6-12 months. If there is active disease, three
month intervals (or less) are more likely. MRIs and CTs are each better
at imaging different body structures. So they may each be chosen in
different situations. Sometimes both types of study are ordered.
-
CT Scans of the Chest/Lungs
(with contrast):
Lungs are one of the two most likely locations for metastases for
ACC patients. At this point, Chest CTs are the best imaging study
for revealing small or low grade lung metastases. Some newer machines
give greater detail, and are more likely to diagnose small or early
stage tumors. These include spiral (or helical) scans and multislice
CT or multidetector CT (MDCT). If these machines are not available,
“fine cuts”should be specified. We generally recommend
annual studies of chest, especially for patients with higher risks
for metastases. However, risks of repeated radiation exposure should
be considered. So for low risk cases of low grade ACC, the interval
may be extended, subject to case specifics.
Notes:
a) IF a patient is getting
Whole Body PET/CT or Whole Body CT surveillance studies, they could
include the Chest CT (as long as it is as detailed/ sensitive as
individual CTscan).
b) In the past, Chest X-Rays had been recommended
for lung screenings or surveillance. But we at ACCIC have learned
that Chest X-Rays will usually not show early stage, small, or low
grade tumors. So for most ACC patients (especially with more common
low grade variety), this study will not diagnose tumors until they
are either widespread or large.
c) The amount of radiation from a CT scan is significantly higher
than that of plain X-Rays. This is still considered a low (and acceptable)
risk by most physicians However it may be a concern for some patients,
and could be considered with regard to frequency of screenings.
Overall lifetime exposure to various radiologic studies (or other
radiation sources) may be a factor.
-
“Low
Radiation” Radiographic Studies of Chest: This
may be an even more precise study for diagnosing lung tumors.
It is not widely used or available at this time. If it is offered,
it should be compared with CT scan with regard to both risks and
potential for diagnoses.
-
Combination Whole Body PET/CT Scans:
A relatively new application of previous technologies, and becoming
more widely available. This may be the most applicable
whole body screening for ACC patients at this time. It
gives the benefits of searching for tumor metabolism as well as
the more precise scanning of the CT. If there is a suspicious
location found with one technology, it can immediately be compared
easily with the other one. (Separate tests are harder to align
and compare.) In general we recommend annual screenings. However,
in low risk cases of low grade ACC, interval between tests may
be extended, subject to case specifics and patient concerns. Exposure
to increased radiation from Whole Body CT may be a consideration
for some. And the issues of long term repeated exposure to various
radiation sources should be taken into consideration.
Notes:
Doing this test would replace need for separate Full
Body PET Scan or CT Scan.
-
Whole Body Bone Scans: Bones
are the second most common site for ACC metastases. This (or a
comparable study) should be done for most ACC patients annually.
In low risk cases of low grade ACC, this interval may be extended,
subject to case specifics. Bone Scans will reveal a number of
possible problems in bones (which are not necessarily cancer).
Areas of “increased uptake” on Bone Scans should be
further investigated with more detailed MRI or CT studies.
Notes: If Whole Body CT or Whole Body PET/CT
combo are performed, they could substitute for this study, although
there is possibility that some problems could be missed. If Whole
Body MRI is used for surveillance, we still recommend performing
Bone Scans in addition (at this point).
-
Whole Body PET Scans: This
is a “nuclear medicine” test, which is used to detect
active tumor growth or cancer metabolic activity anywhere in the
body. A PET scan may show early stage tumor growth, which could
make it potentially valuable for ACC patients. It can also distinguish
between live and old (dead) tumor material, as well as distinguish
between “more active” and “less active”
disease. However, current data indicates that slow growing tumors
with lower metabolism are not noticed as well by PET, and specifically
slow growing pulmonary nodules may go unnoticed. At this
point, we feel that this test by itself is not the most reliable
for most ACC patients, especially for diagnosing small or low
grade tumors. It may be utilized for larger tumors and
to assess change in metabolic activity of known tumors. And PET
can be useful in conjunction with other imaging methods. We
DO advocate use of combination PETscan/CTscan combination for
whole body surveillance at this time (see above). IF
you cannot perform those combo tests, PET may be useful in addition
to separate Whole Body CTscans, Whole Body Bone Scans, or Whole
Body MRIs.
Notes: In order to achieve the most accurate
results, PETscans must be done by experienced people (usually
at academic or research hospitals, or major cancer centers). There
are variables in how test is conducted, and if not done properly
can lead to inaccurate or unclear results. Even with properly
executed tests, false positives and negatives are common. Any
suspicious findings on PETscans should be followed up with more
detailed studies of other types.
-
Whole Body CT Scans:
Whole body CTscans
can detect small tumors in many areas throughout the body. When
Whole Body PET/CT combo scans are not available, separate Whole
Body CTscan and Whole Body PETscan are a reasonable combination,
and should be considered. But when not done concurrently, the
combined data is not as easily evaluated. However this is still
better than PETscans alone. Once again, we would generally recommend
annual whole body surveillance, and Whole Body CT could be a part
of that series. In cases of low grade and low risk ACC, the interval
may be extended, based on case specifics and concerns of radiation
exposure.
-
Whole Body MRIs: This is not yet
commonly available. It should be a safer technology than Whole
Body CT (or most other studies), as it does not use radiation.
Indications are that it could be a more accurate/sensitive study
for many parts of body. This is dependent on the machine, and
at this time there are parts that are still more clearly imaged
with CT. IF Whole Body MRI is offered to you as an alternative
to above studies, it can be considered. But ability to image very
small or low grade tumors as well as details of lungs and bones
needs to be assessed. So, if there is any question, Chest CTscans
and Whole Body Bone Scans should be additionally ordered. PETscans
should also be considered in conjunction with the MRI, if possible.
- The best current option seems to be Whole Body Combination PETscan/CTscan.
- IF that is not available, second reasonable option would be separate
Whole Body CT (with detailed lung study included), in addition to Whole
Body PETscan. Whole Body Bone Scan could be done in addition, but in
most cases it should not be warranted.
- Third Option might be Whole Body MRI (if available). This MAY be a
better option than whole body PET/CT in the future. If bones and/or
lungs are not very detailed, additional Whole Body Bone Scan and Chest
CT may be required.
- In general at this time, localized studies are more accurate and see
more detail than whole body studies. Anything questionable found on
Whole Body studies will likely need to be examined in more detail with
more localized diagnostics.
- Whole Body Studies (other than MRI) all expose patient to very low
doses of radiation (some more than others). Over time, if one gets MANY
of these tests, there are higher potential risks for inducing disease.
This should be taken into consideration on a case by case basis.
12. Needle Biopsies (Fine
Needle Aspirates): Should be performed on undiagnosed PRIMARY
tumors whenever possible. This applies to all unknown suspicious masses/nodules
of any significant size, and especially to salivary gland (and specifically
parotid gland) undiagnosed masses. The exception might be very small nodules
near the surface that can be COMPLETELY excised with definitively clean
margins. In those cases, the excision itself may also be the biopsy. For
potential recurrences or metastases, we recommend needle biopsies whenever
possible. Patient risks should be taken into consideration. When there
have been multiple recurrences or metastases in same (or similar) locations,
then the assumption of progressive disease may be made in lieu of needle
biopsy. All needle biopsies should be followed by detailed pathological
examination and identification of biopsied tissue.
13. Self Exams and Notation of Symptoms:
In addition to the Physical Exams by physicians and Radiologic Imaging
Tests described above, one of the most valuable tools for early
diagnoses of recurrences or metastases is the patient themselves.
Report any suspicious “bumps”, “lumps”,
recurrent or progressive symptoms to your physician(s), and have
them evaluated SOONER RATHER THAN LATER.
Acinic Cell Carcinoma is usually a slow growing cancer. If recurrences
are caught early, when they are small, we at ACCIC feel that you stand
a better chance of getting rid of them completely, and not having
more recurrences or metastases later. We should note that (unfortunately)
at this time (7/05), there are no curative systemic treatments known
for this cancer. So sometimes you may find metastases/recurrences,
but not have any good (permanent) way of treating them. Some physicians
would conclude that early stage diagnostics are therefore unjustified.
We cannot agree with that. It is our experience that the tumors that
hang around for awhile are the ones that cause more problems. And
at least if you diagnose tumors early, there MAY be better or more
options for getting rid of them, than when they are larger. There
are numerous physical methods (surgery, radiation (many types), RadioFrequency
Ablation, Lasers, Embolisation etc) for dealing with small tumors.
So doing these follow-ups and diagnostics can protect you from potential
nightmares in the future.
We feel that there are certain diagnostic exams that are easily recommended,
and without much discussion. Other diagnostics, especially with regards
to radiology are sometimes not as clearcut as to which are the best
exams, and how often to perform them. And there are choices between
getting one or another. As a general statement, we would say that
Whole Body tests available now will usually not give as detailed results
as most individual tests. So a combination of whole body surveillance
and individual more focused studies is suggested in order to maintain
a vigilant regimen of diagnostics.
We at ACCIC feel that it is important to keep informed about the latest
advances in radiology, and which exams will potentially yield the
most accurate results for ACC patients. (So check back with us from
time to time to see if there are updates to this or related pages.)
We do feel that questions of risks created by the tests themselves
should be considered, based on the most recent studies and data, as
well as the specifics of each patient’s case and concerns. And
the frequency of tests should be considered with regard to this. But
this should not keep ACC patients from getting the studies and follow-ups
they need in order to catch new tumor growth as early as possible.
Patients however need to consider these questions and make appropriate
balanced choices for themselves.
We hope that in the future, through the advancement of diagnostic
technologies, that it will become clearer and easier to make definitive
recommendations on these subjects. We also hope that safety concerns
will not be an issue at all. In the meantime, we have tried to provide
you with the latest information and most informed recommendations.
Check back with us for updates.
You can read more details about this subject on the "Radiology
/ Diagnostics To Do" page of this site. The full URL
is http://www.aciniccell.org/radiology_diagnostics_todo.html
There is also a general page on Diagnostics
and Followups, which provides detailed information about many
different diagnostics and also applicable literature for ACC patients.
The full URL is http://www.aciniccell.org/diagnostics_followups.html
For some of the radiology tests we have recommended, there will be
a set of pre-test instructions that your Radiology Department should
get you in advance. Sometimes they will be mailed to you, and sometimes
they will call you. We recommend ASKING when the test is scheduled,
if there ARE any pre-test instructions (just in case they forget to
tell you). Some tests will require you to not eat or drink (except
clear liquids or water usually) for some period of time prior to exam.
Some exams will require you to arrive an hour or two (or more) early
to receive an injection of some sort. Some tests will require you
to drink “contrast medium” at home in advance and/or at
the hospital prior to exam. Sometimes allergies you have will affect
the contrast medium they can give you, so you need to inform technicians
about this in advance (shellfish allergies are one of the indicators).
(They should ask you about this on their own of course.) Some tests
(such as PETscans) will require you to be VERY still and quiet for
at least an hour prior to exam, with almost no movement before and
during test. In many places they will want to give you a mild sedative
for this reason. If you receive the sedative, you will need to have
someone to bring you to and from the hospital. There will be many
other details about the tests that your hospital should inform you
about.
In addition to bringing yourself (and someone to drive you if that
is necessary), and adhering to any pre-test instructions you were
given… We recommend bringing these items:
1) Any Radiology Films (or DVD digital copies) of previous
Radiology Studies that are not on file at the place where
your test is being done. The Radiologists use these tests to compare
changes between studies. So if they are trying to assess change in
a known tumor (or to see if current suspicious areas were there earlier),
they need the previous films. If the tests were performed at the same
hospital, they will have access to them. But if you had them done
somewhere else, they may not. Specifically required are the most recent
previous versions of the SAME test that you are running today. So
for example; if you are getting a Chest CTscan today, you need to
bring your most recent Chest CT, if it was not done at that institution.
If you did not have a Chest CT previously, but you had a Chest X-Ray
or PETscan, bring those as well (or any other studies that showed
the Chest/lungs). We DO recommend that if you can get these
tests sent to the new testing place by the previous testing place
in advance, that is better than leaving your own copies. But
if that has not happened, leave your copies for the radiologists to
use as comparisons. But BE SURE TO LABEL THE ENVELOPES AS: “PATIENT
COPIES – RETURN TO PATIENT”. And write your address and
phone number(s) on the envelope. Also, ask how and when you will get
the films/CDs you leave back. And get a phone number and name in case
you need to follow up on this.
2) Instructions / Notes Memo for Radiologists and Technicians:
We recommend bringing some neatly typed PAPERWORK to the exams, which
can help the technicians and radiologists do a better job with your
diagnostics. The physicians who ordered your test(s) filled out a
very short form, which usually gives very limited information about
your case. In many cases this is adequate. But if you bring more details,
it can often help in making sure nothing gets missed. Not only are
there variables in how some tests are run…the films (or digital
pictures) are read by human beings. Reading these images is not an
exact science, and is surprisingly subjective. If they have more information,
they may be inclined to utilize it in their reading of your studies.
SO…We encourage patients to write up a document (Memo) to hand
to Radiology Technicians (for them and to pass along to Radiologists).
We recommend that the “Memo” include the following (in
order):
a) Your Name, Date of Birth, Patient ID #, etc.
b) The exact name of today’s Study, including body location(s)
(and other details). (eg. “CTscan of the Head and Neck with
contrast”) THIS IS ALSO TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU ARE GETTING THE
RIGHT TEST.
c) The main reasons for today’s study. (Evaluation of tumor
change / screening for possible recurrences / screening for possible
metastases / etc.) This should also include any SYMPTOMS which may
be indicating things the study should look for. You should also include
any recent cancer history that is specifically relevant for this test.
(More detailed/general history comes later.)
d) For low grade ACC cases: A note which is very prominent, reading:
“Note: ANY CHANGE or POSSIBLE TUMOR EVIDENCE, EVEN EXTREMELY
SMALL, IS IMPORTANT, as this can be a VERY slow-growing (and potentially
slowly regressing) cancer (Acinic Cell Carcinoma).”
e) If it is a study that images (or includes) either lungs or bones,
also write “Acinic Cell Carcinoma is known to metastasize
most frequently to bones or lungs.”
f) A short list of previous comparison studies, with dates (the two
most recent previous identical studies) that they can use to compare
with current one.
g) A list of other recent possibly relevant studies, with dates. For
example, if you had a PETscan a month ago, and you are now doing a
full body CTscan, the PET may be relevant, and they should be made
aware of it. Or if you ran a Bone Scan, which showed increased uptake
in your spine, and you are now getting an MRI of the Spine, reference
the Bone Scan.
h) IF you had tumor(s) previously noted in recent scans, then it helps
to copy the relevant text EXACTLY from previous radiology reports.
That way they can compare the areas referenced specifically. (You
could also attach copies of the report(s)).
i) A summary/overview of your cancer history. Enough so they have
the basics.
j) If you need copies of the films / DVDs from TODAY’S STUDY
sent anywhere (or extra copies for yourself), note that at the end
of memo. (And try and arrange to get those copies for yourself before
you leave. It is usually easier THEN than later.)
k) Include your address and phone number.
THANK THEM for taking the time to read your document.
As a cancer patient, you need to be very aware about changes in your
own body. And you need to report those changes to your physician(s)
in a timely manner. No one can know better than you when something
feels “different than normal”. And because of your history,
any unusual sensations or masses or other abnormalities need to be
considered as potential evidence of cancer growth. Don’t let
these kinds of suspicions go on too long. Report changes or symptoms
to your doctors. Often they may be nothing. But then you will have
peace of mind. Other times, you may catch something early, when it
is always easier to deal with.
One thing to keep in mind is that, most of the time, acinic cell carcinoma
is a slow-growing cancer. And often because of this, tumors may silently
grow without causing noticeable symptoms for a long time. So even
slight changes in your body that only you will notice, may be indicative
of something bad going on.
This of course does not mean that you should run to your doctor for
every little odd feeling you have. You have to use your judgement.
Sometime you’ll get a weird pain or discomfort, that happens
once, and you never feel again. People and their bodies often get
strange sensations. But if something happens more than once, or it
lasts several days or weeks, or it is a sudden and serious pain or
symptom, or something is visibly growing… Don’t wait around!
Call your doctor and get it examined. Get tests run if appropriate.
Do all the diagnostics you need to. Catch it early, not late. Better
safe than sorry.
While we have mostly been talking about “Conventional”
and Western methods of cancer treatment, it is important to note that
most of those methods deal only with the results and symptoms of the
disease, and not with the causes. In order to fully deal with the
cancer, you have to help your body’s immune system to fight
the disease, and also to protect it as much as you can, from getting
cancer again. Towards that end, we introduce the vast subject of “Alternative”,
“Complementary” and “Supplemental” methods.
You can read more about these areas on the “Treatment”
pages of this site. Some of these treatments are regimens that are
non-conventional or non-Western “Alternative” treatment
options. But some treatments are more “supplemental and complementary”
to conventional treatments, rather than “alternative”.
These methods can work in conjunctio n with, or in addition to, the
“conventional” treatments, to keep your body strong during
treatment, keep your immune system working, and help to stop the cancer
from recurring. These complementary methods may include such things
as vitamins and supplements, as well as nutrition/diet and lifestyle
choices. There is a great deal of information on these areas, and
much of it is in disagreement. We recommend trying to get hold of
the most recent reliable data, when making decisions about these areas.
We hesitatingly offer some methods that we think have more validity
and documentation for cancer patients in general, based on the research
and information we have accumulated. But this should not be considered
a definitive list.
Some of the things we think are likely helpful and without much
controversy are:
- Eating lots of fruits and vegetables
- Avoiding processed foods with chemicals, preservatives, hormones,
etc.
- Eating organic foods if possible.
- Drinking lots of clear clean water, with as few chemicals as possible.
Some of the things that we recommend, but that may be more controversial
are:
- Eating less sugar, especially refined sugar products.
- Eating less red meat.
- Drinking less alcohol (but not necessarily cutting out). Some moderate
amount of alcohol (and red wine) may actually be healthy.
- Drinking Tea (both green and black seem to have their benefits)
- Taking certain well-documented anti-cancer supplements such as Coriolus
Versicolor mushrooms, or their derivatives PSK and PSP. (One of the
best preparations of these products is the Mushroom Science brand,
which is hot-water-extracted.)
Note: We HAD been recommending a regimen high in anti-oxidant vitamins
and other anti-oxidants, such as Selenium. Over the past few years,
new data has come out which leads us to question this recommendation.
Some studies show that high doses of Vitamin E, Vitamin C or Beta
Carotene may actually be harmful. And there may be some dangers to
taking high antioxidants during Radiation or Chemotherapy, as it could
affect the effectiveness of therapies. (This requires more detailed
examination.) We still feel that some higher dosages of Vitamin C
and other antioxidants MAY have some benefits for the average patient.
And other supplements may also be helpful. But we do not feel knowledgeable
enough in this area to make strong recommendations. These areas should
be evaluated using other more informed sources. As a general conservative
statement here, we think that the amounts of vitamins available in
most multi vitamins are a reasonable place to start, and likely not
harmful. Some data shows that certain minerals and metals may inhibit
absorption of antioxidants or other vitamins. This also requires more
study.
These are just a few examples of things to think about. WE STRONGLY
ENCOURAGE YOU TO SEEK OUT MORE INFORMED SOURCES THAN US ON THESE SUBJECTS.
There may also be some additional information on these subjects on
other pages of our site, including: the ””ACC
Treatment””page and the subpages on "Alternative/Complementary
Options ”, “Vitamins
& Supplements”, “Diet,
Nutrition and Lifestyle”, "Asian
Mushrooms", etc. for more details. Please check “Last
Updated” dates to make sure you are getting our most recent
information on these subjects.
In summation, I feel that there are a few “KEYS” to more
successful treatment of acinic cell carcinoma. Although there is no
standard curative treatment for this cancer at this time, in most
cases it can be managed as a chronic illness for a very long time,
or indefinitely. (I am referring to the more common low grade variety.
For the high grade variety, one must be much more aggressive with
treatment methods, as it can very quickly become life-threatening.)
No matter which grade you have, a successful treatment approach is
largely based on diagnostics and timing. At this point, based on current
information, these are our general recommendations for the best methods
for managing this cancer: This list applies to primary tumors as well
as recurrences and metastases . The “keys” are as follows:
1) Catch primary sites early.
2) Catch primary sites when they are small.
3) Get it ALL when it is small and locally contained.
4) Even if it is large, try and get it ALL in the primary location,
before it recurs or spreads.
5) Treat primary cancer sites in the MOST effective way possible to
insure against future recurrences.
6) Maintain a VIGILANT regimen of follow-ups and diagnostics so that
any recurrences (local or distant) are found and treated when they
are small and contained.
7) Keep a constant watch (through diagnostic methods, as well as your
own awareness and self-exams) for any new possible cancer sites for
THE REST OF YOUR LIFE.
8) Treat recurrences in the most effective way possible as well. Whenever
possible, treat them quickly and completely.
9) Always consider the “risks versus benefits” question
with regards to treatments. Be careful to avoid permanent side effects
and patient deficits, whenever possible. TRY and make balanced INFORMED
decisions which take into account both cancer control and quality
of life issues.
10) Keep aware of new treatments that could be (or prove to be) applicable
for this cancer. Stay informed about new protocols and clinical results.
Keep updated about news from this site or the Acinic Cell email group
at ACOR.org. Consult with physicians. Do your own research. If you
have metastatic or aggressive disease, be willing to try new therapies
that might be effective.
11) Make diet, supplement and lifestyle choices to boost your immune
system and help your body to fight the cancer. Use these in addition
to conventional methods.
12) Take responsibility. Make informed decisions, utilizing information
from reputable sources. Patients need to take on some of the responsibility
for their treatment, especially in the case of a rare disease like
ACC. Stay informed so that YOU know what needs to be done to manage
your case in an effective way.
13) Do not be afraid to inform and be your own advocate with medical
professionals (when appropriate), so that your treatment is handled
in the most effective way possible
The “keys” in this list denote a shared responsibility
between the cancer patient and their physicians.
Back
to top of this page
BACK
TO MAIN PAGE
|
|